Applied Roofing Systems Inc

Applied Roofing Systems Inc is a roofing company based in Webster. Its website says it serves residential, commercial and industrial locations across Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island, and reports 27 years in business. Its Massachusetts home improvement contractor licence 105499 is active on the state registry. A recent Google review says Applied Roofing was prompt with communication and for the appointment after the reviewer met with a few roofing companies for estimates. In a 2022 review, a reviewer said Applied had done two small repair jobs for them and then replaced the majority of their roof in two days, working well into the evening on day 2, with workers combing the landscape for scraps and going over every inch with a rolling magnet so as not to leave a single nail behind. A 2023 reviewer said they have used Applied Roofing Systems on many commercial residential projects. In a 2005 review, a reviewer said Applied Roofing honored a nearly year old quote, removed all the old shingles and added new flashing to the chimney, which solved a moisture problem on one section of the house. In a 2004 review, a reviewer with leaks at two large skylights said Applied Roofing recommended replacing the roof, and that there were no leaks after several downpours in the month since the job was done; liquid tar was left in the driveway, and Applied Roofing sent someone out right away to clean it up. In another 2004 review, a reviewer said Steve Jankowski estimated their roof at 1500 sq. ft. while others quoted up to 1800, no extra shingles were needed, and the price was $3000 less than the closest competitor's quote. In a 2003 review, a reviewer said the company added 30lb paper instead of the quoted 15lb paper at no additional cost. In a 2002 review, a reviewer said Todd came within two days to check the roof and left shingle samples, and the crew was at the job within four business days of the bid being accepted. In a 2004 review, a reviewer said the clean-up left something to be desired. In a 2003 review, a reviewer said Princeton is a little out of their area and they paid a premium for the distance. An osha.gov page lists a citation under 29 CFR 1910.132(a) for protective equipment that was not provided, used, and/or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition.